Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Author Guidelines

Manuscript Submission Guidelines

Before submitting your manuscript to Georgian Biomaterials Journal, it is imperative to review the Aims & Scope.

The Georgian Biomaterials Journal (Publisher: University of Georgia Publishing House) follows the guidelines of COPE (COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines; https://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf and https://publicationethics.org/core-practices). Furthermore, the journal aligns with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (https://www.icmje.org/recommendations) concerning the ethical conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scientific research in the health and biomedical sciences. We also follow the most recent Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines on authorship and transparency (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp3).

By submitting a manuscript to this journal, authors confirm that they have read and agreed to all policies and ethical requirements outlined. The papers must follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Online Submission

Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively through the online submission system at https://geobioj.com/geo/index.php/geo/login. The editorial office does not accept submissions via third-party agencies or intermediaries. Submissions should be made by the corresponding author or one of the listed co-authors submissions by individuals not involved in the work will not be considered. The corresponding author is responsible for uploading the signed copyright form along with the manuscript.

Only manuscripts written in English will be accepted. Authors are strongly encouraged to have their manuscripts reviewed by a native English speaker to ensure correct grammar and language quality. A professional language check is highly recommended prior to submission to avoid delays in the peer review process.

Each submission must also be accompanied by a cover letter that includes a statement confirming that the study adheres to current ethical standards.

Manuscript Preparation

Registered users can monitor the status of their submissions by logging into the system with their credentials. Manuscripts that do not comply with the “Authors' Guidelines” will be returned to the authors for technical revisions prior to the editorial and peer-review process. Submissions should generally include multiple separate files.

Cover Letter:
A cover letter addressed to the Editor-in-Chief must be submitted with the manuscript. This letter should include the type of the article and a statement confirming that the manuscript is not under review elsewhere and has been submitted exclusively to this journal. These details may be included on the first page of the manuscript or in the cover letter itself.

Article Types Overview

Original Research Articles
These are detailed studies that present new and important findings, typically running up to about 8,000 words, covering tables, figures, and references. The focus is on originality and scientific validity, especially regarding the methods used in analysis. When preparing these papers, authors should adhere to the guidelines provided by the EQUATOR Network for original research. Additionally, any research involving humans or animals must have approval from the relevant ethics committee of the institution, hospital, or university involved. References in these articles should be limited to no more than 25.

Review Articles
Review articles summarize and synthesize existing research on a recent or significant topic, generally up to 8,000 words, including tables, figures, and references. These papers offer a thorough discussion of current studies and aim to reach balanced conclusions based on previous research and ongoing debates.

Systematic Reviews
These are rigorous literature reviews that analyze all high-quality studies related to a specific question. They must follow a structured format: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. The goal is to draw evidence-based conclusions. The Methods section needs to clearly describe the search strategy, data extraction process, evidence grading, and analysis methods. Authors should conform to PRISMA guidelines (www.prisma-statement.org). The topic should be well-defined, and the review should lead to solid, evidence-based findings. Authors are also encouraged to register their systematic reviews on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
For meta-analyses of observational studies, the MOOSE guidelines (http://www.ijo.in/documents/14MOOSE_SS.pdf) should be followed.
Guidelines for reporting can be found at the EQUATOR network (www.equator-network.org).

Mini-reviews 

Mini-reviews must follow a well-defined structure, including an introduction, a detailed body, and a conclusion. Each section should highlight the current progress and developments in the relevant field. The goal of these reviews is to update readers of the Journal of Composites and Compounds on the most recent innovations across a range of areas, such as clinical and biological applications, nanotechnology, energy, sensors, catalysis, environmental technologies, and surface modification methods.

These articles should be succinct, with a maximum length of 3,000 words. The abstract should not exceed 350 words. Authors may include two or three tables or figures where appropriate, along with 50 to 100 references. In some cases, longer reviews may be accepted if the subject warrants extended discussion.

All submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process. Authors should avoid including unpublished data, works currently under review, or personal communications, as this may lead to rejection or delays during the review process.

Case Reports
These are detailed descriptions of individual cases that highlight a unique or unusual patient history, possibly involving a single case or a series of cases. The focus is on new insights gained from the presentation, investigation, or management of the case. It’s highly recommended to follow the CARE guidelines (http://www.care-statement.org/), including submitting the CARE checklist as a separate file. References should be limited to 15.

Commentaries
Commentaries offer a platform for focused insights, allowing authors to propose specific directions or address recent scientific topics with strong relevance. These articles should be concise no longer than 1,000 words (typically one to two pages)and must include references. While abstracts and keywords are not required, all commentaries are peer-reviewed to ensure their significance, quality, and relevance.

News and Views
This section covers recent breakthroughs or developments in kidney disease treatment, including the perspectives of the authors. Up to 10 references are allowed.

Hypothesis
Short papers that propose a new, well-supported hypothesis related to kidney disease treatment or related topics. These should clearly state the hypothesis and include references (no more than 10) to back it up.

Perspective
Perspective articles, usually by invitation, discuss recent advancements in a specific area while offering the author’s personal outlook on the future of the field. They must be framed within the context of relevant literature from the past three years and follow a format similar to a review.

Typically written by one or two authors, these articles communicate exciting developments to an interdisciplinary audience.

They should be 2,000–4,000 words in total, including abstract, main text, references, and figure legends. Titles must be concise and engaging; abstracts limited to 50 words, and references capped at 35. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review.

Editorials
These are opinion or commentary articles on current or relevant topics within the journal’s scope, typically written by editors or invited experts. They should include no more than 10 references.

Letters to the Editor
Letters can comment on or debate recent articles published in the journal, sharing opinions or discussing controversies. The journal will review these with the original authors before publication. Limit references to 10.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Authors are required to disclose any financial interests, relationships, commercial affiliations, or other circumstances that could be perceived by the academic community as potential conflicts of interest. In the absence of such relationships, authors should include the statement: “All authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.”

It is mandatory to upload a ‘Declaration of Conflicting Interests’ statement during the submission process. Additionally, authors must complete the Conflict of Interest form available at the following link: Conflict.doc

Authors’ Contributions

All submitted manuscripts must include a clear statement detailing each author’s contribution. Individuals who contributed to the research but do not meet the  ICMJE Criteria for Authorship should be recognized in the Acknowledgments section.

If any changes to the list of authors (addition or removal) are made after submission, a formal letter of explanation and an updated signed copyright form must be provided.

Authors’ contributions may be described using the following categories:

  • Conceptualization
  • Methodology
  • Validation
  • Formal Analysis
  • Investigation
  • Resources
  • Data Curation
  • Writing – Original Draft
  • Writing – Review & Editing
  • Visualization
  • Supervision
  • Project Administration
  • Funding Acquisition

 

Availability of Materials and Protocols

For original research articles, the Methods section must provide sufficient detail to allow reproducibility. GBJ strongly encourages authors to share their experimental protocols via [https://www.protocols.io] , an open-access platform. When using this service, please cite the DOI of your protocol in both the Methods section and the reference list.

Additionally, the journal supports the inclusion of Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) to improve resource transparency. Authors are encouraged to include RRIDs in the Materials and Methods section when applicable. For more information, visit: [https://www.rrids.org/] and [ https://scicrunch.org/resources]

Formatting:

Authors are kindly requested to format their manuscripts according to the journal template. You can download the template file here.

Manuscript Formatting and Submission Guidelines for the Georgian Biomaterials Journal

General Formatting Instructions
Manuscripts must be submitted in Microsoft Word format and should include page numbers. The use of footnotes is strictly prohibited.
All abbreviations must be defined in full upon their first appearance both in the abstract and in the main body of the manuscript.

When referring to pharmaceutical compounds, generic drug names should be used. Trademarked or registered drug names must be accompanied by the superscript ® or ™ symbols as appropriate.

Manuscript Structure
Articles submitted to the Georgian Biomaterials Journal, whether original research or review articles, should follow the structure below:

    Title

    Title Page

    Structured Abstract

    Keywords

    Main Text

    Conclusion

    Study Limitations

    Acknowledgments

    Authors' Contributions

    Ethical Considerations

    Conflict of Interest Statement

    Data Availability Statement

    Consent for Publication

    Funding Information

    References

    Figures/Illustrations (if applicable)

    Tables (if applicable)

    Supplementary Material (if applicable)

Title Page 
The title of the manuscript should be concise and must include a short running title (maximum 80 characters). Below the title, list all authors’ names along with their full affiliations in the following order: department, institution, city and province/state, followed by the country.

Authors must include their ORCID iDs, which can be registered at https://orcid.org. The corresponding author should also provide a valid phone number and email address (academic and/or personal).

Abstract Format
All research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses must be accompanied by a structured abstract. Suggested subheadings include:

    Introduction

    Objectives

    Materials and Methods (or Patients and Methods)

    Results

    Conclusion

Keywords
Select at least three relevant keywords related to the core content of the manuscript.

Introduction
The introduction should briefly present the scientific background (within 600 words), supported by appropriate references. Avoid overloading with literature. The final paragraph should clearly state the research objectives.

Objectives
This section should succinctly define the purpose and aims of the study.

Materials and Methods / Patients and Methods
Provide adequate methodological details to allow reproducibility. Include supplier information (company name, city, country) and catalog numbers where relevant. If previously published methods are used, cite the original work and describe only significant modifications. Clearly specify any hazards or ethical concerns. For studies involving humans or animals, mention the approval by ethics committees and confirm that informed consent was obtained.

Results
Present results clearly and concisely. Use appropriate figures or tables, but avoid presenting the same data in multiple formats. Interpretations should be reserved for the Discussion section.

Discussion
Discuss the implications and significance of your findings without restating the results. Avoid excessive citation of existing literature.

Conclusion
Summarize the key findings in a standalone section. This may also be integrated into the Discussion, if preferred.

Tables
Tables must be created in Word (DOC or RTF format) and saved as a separate document. Do not include tables within the main text.

Figures
Figures should be submitted in high-resolution formats (TIF or EPS), adhering to the following specifications:

    Line art (e.g., charts): 1200 dpi

    Black & white photos (halftones): 300 dpi

    Combined images (e.g., labeled figures): 600 dpi
    Vector graphics should be submitted in EPS format

Reference Formatting
All references, including web URLs, must be cited in numerical order based on their first appearance in the text, tables, or figure legends. Each citation should be enclosed in square brackets [ ] and assigned a unique number. While referencing authors by name in the text is acceptable, the corresponding reference number must always be included.

Please limit the number of citations to only those that are essential. If using reference management software with automatic numbering, ensure that the references are properly finalized and formatted before submission.

For reference management, it is strongly recommended to use EndNote, with the GBJ EndNote Style File. All citations in the manuscript whether in the main text, tables, or figures must match the numerical order of the reference list.

All citations in the text, tables or figures must correspond to the numerical order of the reference list. In the reference list at the end of the text, list the first six authors followed by "et al." for the remaining authors. Only include published or accepted articles in the reference list. For works that are accepted but not yet published, use "in press" instead of page numbers. For material intended for publication but not yet accepted, use "unpublished work" or "submitted for publication." Unpublished data or personal communications should be cited only in the text and not listed in the reference list.

All references should have a valid link or DOI.

  • Millanao AR, Mora AY, Villagra NA, Bucarey SA, Hidalgo AA. Biological effects of quinolones: a family of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Molecules. 2021;26(23):7153. DOI: https://doi.org/....
  • Chierentin L, Salgado HR. Review of properties and analytical methods for the determination of norfloxacin. Critical reviews in analytical chemistry. 2016;46(1):22-39. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/

Submission Preparation Checklist

All submissions must meet the following requirements.

  • This submission meets the requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
  • This submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration.
  • All references have been checked for accuracy and completeness.
  • All tables and figures have been numbered and labeled.
  • Permission has been obtained to publish all photos, datasets and other material provided with this submission.

Research Article

Focus and Scope:

This section includes original research articles that present significant new findings resulting from empirical, experimental, or theoretical work. Manuscripts must contribute new knowledge, interpretations, or understanding within the field of the journal.

Peer Review:

All submissions in this section are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two experts in the field.

Ethical Considerations:

Authors must ensure that the research complies with ethical standards and includes approval from appropriate institutional review boards where necessary.

Language:

Submissions are accepted in English.

Review Article

Focus and Scope:

This section includes comprehensive articles that summarize, analyze, and synthesize existing research on a specific topic. Review articles should provide critical evaluation and offer new perspectives or frameworks.

Peer Review:
Submissions are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two reviewers.

Ethical Considerations:
Although original data are not required, ethical standards in citation and academic integrity must be followed.

Mini Review

Focus and Scope:
Mini Reviews are short, focused review articles that provide concise overviews of emerging topics, recent advances, or specialized subfields. Unlike full-length reviews, Mini Reviews are brief, targeted, and not expected to be comprehensive. They are ideal for summarizing the current state of a narrow research area.

Peer Review:
Submissions are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two experts.

Ethical Considerations:
All sources must be accurately cited. Authors should avoid plagiarism and disclose any conflicts of interest.

Commentaries

Focus and Scope:
Commentaries are short opinion pieces published alongside original articles. They offer expert reflections, highlight the strengths or implications of the main article, or provide constructive critique. These are not original research articles and are typically invited by the editors during or after peer review.

Peer Review:
Commentaries are usually editor-invited and reviewed, not submitted through open calls. In some cases, they may undergo editorial review only.

Ethical Considerations:
Authors must maintain professionalism and disclose any conflicts of interest. The commentary must be respectful and evidence-based.

Case Report

Focus and Scope:
This section features detailed reports of individual cases that offer unique or rare insights into clinical, scientific, or technical issues. Case Reports should highlight unusual or novel conditions, treatments, or observations that can contribute to existing knowledge.

Peer Review:
All submissions are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two reviewers with subject expertise.

Ethical Considerations:
Authors must obtain written informed consent from the subject(s) or their legal guardian(s). Anonymity must be preserved. Approval from an ethics committee is recommended when applicable.

Letters to the Editor

Focus and Scope:
Letters can comment on or debate recent articles published in the journal, sharing opinions or discussing controversies. The journal will review these with the original authors before publication. References should be limited to 10. Letters may also provide brief comments, clarifications, or critiques related to topics relevant to nephrology.

Peer Review:

Letters undergo editorial review for relevance and appropriateness but typically are not peer-reviewed.

Ethical Considerations:

Letters must be respectful, avoid personal attacks, and disclose any conflicts of interest.

News and Views

Focus and Scope:
This section covers recent breakthroughs or developments in kidney disease treatment, including the perspectives of the authors. Articles may include brief news reports, commentary on scientific advances, conference highlights, or editorial opinions, aligned with the journal’s scope.

Peer Review:

Content is typically editor-reviewed and invited. Some pieces may undergo light peer review depending on journal policy.

Ethical Considerations:

Authors should disclose any conflicts of interest. All content must adhere to standards of accuracy and professionalism.

Systematic Review

Focus and Scope:
This section publishes systematic reviews that address specific research questions using transparent, replicable methods to identify, evaluate, and synthesize results from existing studies. Submissions should follow established guidelines such as PRISMA.

Peer Review:
All submissions are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two experts familiar with review methodology and the subject area.

Ethical Considerations:
Authors must ensure that all included studies are cited properly. No ethical approval is required unless unpublished data or personal communications are included.

Meta-Analysis

Focus and Scope:
This section publishes articles that statistically combine results from multiple independent studies addressing the same research question, aiming to derive overall conclusions and identify patterns or effects. Meta-Analyses should follow rigorous methodologies and reporting standards such as PRISMA.

Peer Review:
Submissions undergo double-blind peer review by experts knowledgeable in meta-analytic techniques and the subject area.

Ethical Considerations:
Proper citation and ethical use of included studies are mandatory. Ethical approval is generally not required unless unpublished data is used.

Technical Note

Focus and Scope:
This section publishes brief articles describing new methods, techniques, equipment, or software that advance research or practice in the journal’s field. Technical Notes should provide sufficient detail for reproducibility and practical application.

Peer Review:
All submissions are subject to double-blind peer review by at least two experts.

Ethical Considerations:
Authors must ensure accuracy, originality, and proper acknowledgment of sources. Ethical standards should be maintained, especially when the technique involves human or animal subjects.

Hypothesis

Focus and Scope:
Short papers that propose a new, well-supported hypothesis related to kidney disease treatment or related topics. These should clearly state the hypothesis and include references (no more than 10) to back it up. The aim is to stimulate scientific discussion and guide future research directions.

Peer Review:

Hypothesis articles undergo rigorous peer review to evaluate originality, scientific plausibility, and relevance.

Ethical Considerations:

Authors must ensure their hypotheses are grounded in existing scientific evidence and clearly distinguish speculation from established facts.

Editorials

Focus and Scope:
These are opinion or commentary articles on current or relevant topics within the journal’s scope, typically written by editors or invited experts. They should include no more than 10 references. Editorials comment on important research findings, policy implications, or provide perspectives on the journal’s content and direction.

Peer Review:

Editorials are usually editor-reviewed and do not undergo formal peer review

Ethical Considerations:

Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest. Editorials should be balanced, clear, and professional.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.